Isn’t a charcuterie board just a fancy cheese platter? ee) has morphed into a modern appetizer catch-all to include a wide variety of cheeses, dips, fruits, nuts, and crackers spread on trays with a host of different meats for parties and snacking.Terrine (forcemeat or aspic, similar to pâté), sausage, and salami are just a few. Hearkening from France, the term charcuterie (or Salumi in Italian) traditionally refers to cured meats, specifically different ways to serve as well as preserve before refrigeration was available. More Recipes for Entertaining You’ll Love.TIPS for Wine Pairings with Charcuterie.Arranging a Charcuterie Board STEP BY STEP.How long should a charcuterie board sit at room temperature?.Ideas for serving charcuterie as a main meal.Ideas for serving charcuterie for breakfast or light lunch.When is the best time to serve charcuterie?.How much should I buy/serve for charcuterie?.
Nerd clusters near me how to#
How to Select Cheese for a Charcuterie Board.How to Select Meat for a Charcuterie Board.Elements of the Best Charcuterie Boards.Isn’t a charcuterie board just a fancy cheese platter?.My argument is that there are many different possible functions at play here and that a lot of this work has a cultural function that overrides its function as a legible data representation,Īgain, great work, look forward to the next one. The “wow” effect – the message that *there is lots of data here* is a valuable one simply because of the current cultural value of data as a concept. Work like the Fathom GE pieces just doesn’t operate in a “standard” visualisation context, if there is such a thing. For me this cuts through the tension in your discussion between the engagement of the “shiny” vis, and the concerns about its functional failures. One point I would like to hear more on, though, is datavis as a cultural practice. But I was impressed at the balance and openness in the discussion.Īlso, fantastic to hear some critical voices responding to the flood of data vis work. As I listened I thought it was going to turn into another episode in the datavis culture wars, ie hci-based functional vis vs designer eye candy. Really appreciate the concept and the form, it’s a joy to hear some human voices in this world of text and image. What do you think of animation in visualization? Is it effective? Can you resist the allure? Related episodes Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(4), 2006, pp. A Comparison of Animated Maps with Static Small-Multiple Maps for Visually Identifying Space-Time Clusters.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2008) 14(6) 1325 – 1332. Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization.Animation: can it facilitate? Tversky et al.Well-crafted round-up article by Andy Kirk GE Installations (turbines and imaging scans).Here are some useful links to follow the discussion.
3D DebateĢ9:37 – Engagement and “Data Entertainment” Hi Folks, in this episode we discuss the goods and bads of animated visualization:Ģ7:17 – Eye-candy and the 2D vs.
0 kommentar(er)
